The dominant mode of relating to books is, of course, by not reading them. The thesis of this short, brilliant work is that the notion of "not-reading" is more ambiguous than we usually admit. His job is to relieve the anxiety and shame that go along with "not having read a book," in order to liberate (non)readers to talk about them anyway. There is some overreaching here, but overall this is one of the best books I read this year, and one of the most stimulating books I have ever read (or at least as far as I can remember, which is kind of the point). For all you haters out there, yes, I did read most of this book - I probably skimmed only about a dozen pages altogether. If you have a problem with that last sentence, then I say to you, "Tolle, lege."
This interviewer from the N.Y. Times claims to have read the book before talking to Prof. Bayard; to judge from her questions, she has thereby confirmed Bayard's thesis that having read a book does not necessarily enable you to make intelligent observations based on it.
#52: Joshua Ferris, Then We Came to the End. Well, this book has appeared on several year-end "best of" lists, but it left me feeling a little meh. The characters have distinctive personalities, interests, and actions, but they all seemed to talk in the same casual, banter-y, bright-toned register. Also, hasn't this tale of cubicle life been done before? Why does the subject seem so familiar? It's not a particular novel I have in mind, though more knowledgeable readers (or non-readers!) may know more, but it's definitely been worked over in other mediums - comics (Dilbert, right?), TV and movies (The Office, Office Space, Clockwatchers, etc.) Enjoyable enough, if you've got nothing else to do at your cube farm.
No comments:
Post a Comment